Selected Papers of The Jurist (法学家), Volume 1
- Renmin Chinese Law Review: Selected Papers of The Jurist
Edited by Jichun Shi
Chapter 5: Rethinking the NPC Standing Committee’s basic law revision power
In recent years, the National People’s Congress Standing Committee’s (‘NPCSC’ hereinafter) exercise of the basic law revision power has often been a topic of academic dispute. For instance, in 2008, legal scholars disputed whether the NPCSC could revise the Criminal Procedure Act by amending the Lawyers Law. In 2010, the issue of whether the NPCSC could have the authority to revise the People’s Representatives Law (‘PRL’ hereinafter) was also hotly debated. Some law professors argued that the NPCSC could not be allowed to amend the PRL, and it should be changed by the NPC itself. Others challenged that it is impossible to prevent the NPCSC from revising the PRL, since the Constitution has clearly authorized it to revise basic laws and the PRL is absolutely a basic law. Although the NPCSC eventually did adopt the revised bill, it is still worth pondering the rationality of the exercise of the basic law revision power, as well as the relationship between the NPC and its standing committee.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.