Research Handbook on EU Institutional Law
Show Less

Research Handbook on EU Institutional Law

Edited by Adam Lazowski and Steven Blockmans

Research Handbook on EU Institutional Law offers a critical look into the European Union: its legal foundations, competences and institutions. It provides an analysis of the EU legal system, its application at the national level and the prevalent role of the Court of Justice. Throughout the course of the Handbook the expert contributors discuss whether the European Union is well equipped for the 21st century and the numerous crises it has to handle. They revisit the call for an EU reform made in the Laeken Conclusions in 2001 to verify if its objectives have been achieved by the Treaty of Lisbon and in daily practice of the EU institutions. The book also delves into the concept of a Europe of different speeds, which - according to some - is inevitable in the EU comprising 28 Member States. Overall, the assessment of the changes introduced by the Lisbon Treaty is positive, even if there are plenty of suggestions for further reforms to re-fit the EU for purpose.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 12: The Court of Justice, the national courts, and the spirit of cooperation: between Dichtung and Wahrheit

Michal Bobek


The importance of the preliminary ruling procedure for the judicial structure of the Union and EU law as a system of law can hardly be overstated. The most significant decisions that shaped the EU legal order, including household names like Van Gend en Loos, Costa, Internationale Handelsgesellschaft, Factortame, Mangold, and many others, were all rendered as answers to preliminary ruling questions posed by national courts pursuant to Art. 177 TE(E)C, later Art. 234 TEC, today Art. 267 TFEU. There are naturally other ways in which the national courts and the Court of Justice of the European Union (the Court) may mutually engage. If we remain within the framework of formalized judicial proceedings, a national court may for instance draw inspiration from a decision of the Court rendered in proceedings other than preliminary rulings. A national court may also rely on a decision of the Court as a (mere) persuasive authority outside its material or temporal scope of application. Conversely, the Court might seek inspiration from the case law of national courts which can be seen as evidence of general principles of law common to the Member States, even without expressly acknowledging it by a citation in its decision or the Opinion of an Advocate General. Equally, the Court might be sensitive to messages sent in particular by national superior courts outside the preliminary rulings procedure. Such messages would be transmitted through a different case decided on the national level, which has not been submitted to the Court.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.