Research Handbook on EU Institutional Law
Show Less

Research Handbook on EU Institutional Law

Edited by Adam Lazowski and Steven Blockmans

Research Handbook on EU Institutional Law offers a critical look into the European Union: its legal foundations, competences and institutions. It provides an analysis of the EU legal system, its application at the national level and the prevalent role of the Court of Justice. Throughout the course of the Handbook the expert contributors discuss whether the European Union is well equipped for the 21st century and the numerous crises it has to handle. They revisit the call for an EU reform made in the Laeken Conclusions in 2001 to verify if its objectives have been achieved by the Treaty of Lisbon and in daily practice of the EU institutions. The book also delves into the concept of a Europe of different speeds, which - according to some - is inevitable in the EU comprising 28 Member States. Overall, the assessment of the changes introduced by the Lisbon Treaty is positive, even if there are plenty of suggestions for further reforms to re-fit the EU for purpose.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 13: Five decades since Van Gend en Loos and Costa came to town: primacy, direct and indirect effect revisited

Agata B. Capik


Because of its two ‘Old Masters’ – uniformly assessed in the academic literature as seminal, landmarking, underlying, revolutionary, fundamental, crucial, constitutive, and constitutional – which established a very significant feature of the EU law curriculum over the past decades, every law student in Europe and beyond frequently hears the stories of Van Gend en Loos and Costa v E.N.E.L. in their introductory courses to EU law. Hence, even if what the Court has pushed for is not always consistently applied in national courtrooms, at least it is in the classrooms. There have been a remarkable number of volumes written, arguing and commenting on the principle of primacy, the doctrines of direct and indirect effect, to a certain extent schizophrenically using the above mentioned ‘adjectivity’ to describe the legal meaning of the Court’s said rulings on the one hand, while alleging the shortcomings of their impact, on the other. After all that has been said, one observation remains, nevertheless, evident: what looked quite unconditional, clear and precise five decades ago, no longer looks that way today. It holds much more true that there is an open question, which could be, not entirely uncontroversially, phrased as follows: could the move indeed be called ‘a genuine revolution’, whilst it still does not work, in spite of appearances? It is commonly argued that the most significant achievement of the ‘motor of integration’ has been to integrate European (Community) law into the domestic legal orders of the Member States.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.