Innovation, Employment and Education
Edited by Greg Hearn, Ruth Bridgstock, Ben Goldsmith and Jess Rodgers
Chapter 3: Compensating differentials in Creative Industries and occupations: some evidence from HILDA
We interrogate the Household Income Labour Dynamics Australia (HILDA) survey panel for evidence supporting the claim that the market for creative labour is precarious. We find that the assertion of precarious employment is probably overblown, being only relatively evident among creatives within Creative Industries and not at all evident among creatives embedded in other industries. The ‘relative’ precariousness appears more to be a function of the industry, rather than occupational classification, and not systemic to creative employment as a whole. The data also reveal the significant variety of non-monetary compensating factors working to affect the relative desirability of work within the creative sector such that precarity might actually be a dimension against which other terms of compensation are traded. We conclude that, when these compensating differentials are factored in, employment in either Creative Industries and/ or occupations is, in aggregate, neither better nor worse than employment in other sectors.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.