Research Handbook on the Globalization of Chinese Firms
Show Less

Research Handbook on the Globalization of Chinese Firms

Edited by Craig C. Julian, Zafar U. Ahmed and Junqian Xu

This comprehensive research Handbook encompasses an expansive range of perspectives on the globalization process of Chinese firms. Eminent global scholars provide contributions on a variety of topics, including: • industrial innovation; • technological innovation and learning; • the performance of Chinese international joint ventures,; • the global consumer; • Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) including barriers to FDI and FDI in China’s hinterland areas; • the globalization of Chinese business practices in Africa; • the Human Resource Management Transfer Process; • Corporate Information Disclosure in China’s Stock Market; and • the home employment effect.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 1: Industrial innovation in Chinese firms

Li Yu and Zhang Yanming


Numerous empirical studies and theoretical exploration have been conducted to test Schumpeter's hypothesis that large enterprises foster technological innovation. The supporters of the theory believe that scale economies in research and development (R & D) derive from the following: (1) due to the incompleteness of capital markets, large enterprises have greater capability to manage risk associated with investment in R & D; (2) specialization and division of labor efficiencies create scale economies; (3) different innovative programs within a large enterprise can share the fixed costs; (4) large enterprises can use R & D results effectively; (5) a large enterprise can maintain monopoly profits from long-term innovation because it can protect its intellectual property better. However, many empirical studies counter Schumpeter's hypothesis with a different conclusion: the situation that Schumpeter's hypothesis depicts barely exists in many industries. In contrast, small enterprises seem to be more propitious in innovating with marketing sensitivity and organizational agility (Acs and Audretsch, 1991; Worley, 1961; Horowitz et al., 1999). According to the literature, the reason for the dispute focuses on industrial characteristics. Schumpeter's hypothesis applies no restrictive condition on industry characteristics, but testing of the hypothesis is based on industry-specific data. Scherer (1980) notes that industrial effects are the main reason for conflicting conclusions in empirical studies on the technological innovation and firm size relationship.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.