Handbook of Contemporary Research on Emerging Markets
Show Less

Handbook of Contemporary Research on Emerging Markets

Edited by Hemant Merchant

The Handbook brings together leading scholars from IB as well as other disciplines to contribute state-of-the-art thinking on emerging markets. The volume extends theoretical and conceptual thinking, looks at operational practices and their implications and provides a research agenda to move the field forward. The contributors offer an in-depth look at specific geographies and functional areas to enrich our understanding of emerging markets.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 3: Institutional theory and institution building in emerging economies

Len J. Treviño


Emerging economies are characterized by turbulence and uncertainty that may take the form of rapid political, economic, and institutional changes that are often accompanied by relatively underdeveloped factor and product markets (Wright, Filatotchev, Hoskisson, and Peng, 2005). Emerging economies can be distinguished from developed economies by virtue of their strong economic growth, with many emerging economies experiencing gross domestic product (GDP) growth rates that dramatically outpace those in developed countries. Because of their strong growth rates and burgeoning economic development, in 2013 for the first time more than half of the world’s GDP originated from emerging economies (Economist, 2013). Although some of the highest growth rates over the last two decades came from Brazil, Russia, India, and China (i.e., the BRIC countries), their share of global output is no longer rising as fast as it did in the 2000s. Emerging economies can also be distinguished from developed economies on the basis of institutional constraints (Child and Tsai, 2005; Peng, 2000; Wright et al., 2005), institutional distance (Xu and Shenkar, 2002), and institutional voids (Khanna and Palepu, 1997). Institutional constraints refer to government and societal institutions that impose regulatory constraints upon the strategies that firms may pursue and, as such, they are related to the regulatory pillar as outlined by Scott (1995). Xu and Shenkar (2002) argue that institutional distance between the home and the host country must be matched to firm-level attributes in order to establish the organizational legitimacy of the foreign subsidiary in the host country.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.