Comparative Institutional Analysis
Show Less

Comparative Institutional Analysis Theory, Corporations and East Asia. Selected Papers of Masahiko Aoki

Theory, Corporations and East Asia. Selected Papers of Masahiko Aoki

Masahiko Aoki

Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 16: Endogenizing institutions and institutional changes

Masahiko Aoki

Extract

[16] Journal of Institutional Economics (2007), 3: 1, 1–31 Printed in the United Kingdom C The JOIE Foundation 2006 doi:10.1017/S1744137406000531 Endogenizing institutions and institutional changes∗ MASAHIKO AOKI Stanford University Abstract: This paper proposes an analytical-cum-conceptual framework for understanding the nature of institutions as well as their changes. First, it proposes a new definition of institution based on the notion of common knowledge regarding self-sustaining features of social interactions with a hope to integrate various disciplinary approaches to institutions and their changes. Second, it specifies some generic mechanisms of institutional coherence and change – overlapping social embeddedness, Schumpeterian innovation in bundling games, and dynamic institutional complementarities – useful for understanding the dynamic interactions of economic, political, social, organizational, and cognitive factors. 1. Introduction A consensus seems to have emerged among economists, as well as among other social scientists, that ‘institutions matter’ for understanding the differences in economic performances among various economies over time and space (e.g., Nelson and Sampat, 2001; the World Bank, 2002). But, if institutions are nothing more than codified laws, fiats, organizations, and other such deliberate human devices, why can’t badly performing economies design (emulate) ‘good’ institutions and implement them? This question would naturally lead us to a more fundamental, ontological question of what institutions are. Institutions are customarily identified with the ‘rules of the game’ by economists and others (e.g., North, 1990: 5). However, within this thrust, their nature, origin, and relevance to economic analysis are seemingly treated in two different ways. One...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.