Chapter 22: Historical sources of institutional trajectories in economic development: China, Japan and Korea compared
 Socio-Economic Review (2013) 11, 233–263 Advance Access publication February 4, 2013 doi:10.1093/ser/mws028 Historical sources of institutional trajectories in economic development: China, Japan and Korea compared† Masahiko Aoki* Department of Economics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA * Downloaded from http://ser.oxfordjournals.org/ by guest on June 20, 2013 Correspondence: email@example.com This article ﬁrst provides a game-theoretic, endogenous view of institutions and then applies the idea to identify the sources of institutional trajectories of economies development in China, Japan, and Korea. It stylises the Malthusian phase of the East Asian economies as a peasant-based economies in which small conjugal families self-managed their working times between farming on small plots— leased or owned—and handcrafting for personal consumption and markets. It then compares institutional arrangements across these economies that sustained otherwise similar economies. It characterises the varied nature of the political states of Qing China, Tokugawa Japan and Yi Korea by focusing on the way agricultural taxes were enforced. It also identiﬁes different patterns of social norms of trust that were institutional complements to, or substitutes for, the political states. Finally, it traces the path-dependent transformations of these state-norm combinations along subsequent transitions to post-Malthusian phases of economic growth in the respective economies. Keywords: China, Japan, institutional complementarity, institutional change, varieties of capitalism, norms, political economy JEL classiﬁcation: O43, O53, P51 1. Introduction: The co-evolution of economic, demographic and institutional variables One of the most important social scientiﬁc research agendas today is to understand the dynamic nature of...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.