The Politics of Public–Private Partnerships in Western Europe
Show Less

The Politics of Public–Private Partnerships in Western Europe

Comparative Perspectives

Thomas Krumm

This comprehensive book provides a comparative policy analysis of public-private partnerships in 14 Western European countries from Scandinavia to Greece, bringing together insights from government, economics and politics. Thomas Krumm describes and analyses the forms and extents of collaboration between the state and private sector organisations, focusing on political drivers for a policy change in favour of PPP and the supportive and limiting socioeconomic and institutional conditions. Using comparative data, the author charts key policies and actors involved in supporting collaboration between the state and private business organisations across these countries.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 4: The Nordic countries

Thomas Krumm


The overall approach of the Nordic countries towards PPP can be described as quite sceptical. There are some publicly funded pilot projects at national level and some local activities, but PPP politics never ‘lifted off’ in these countries. Surprisingly, there is a lot of research literature on PPP in the Scandinavian countries, contrarily to the level of PPP commitment there. Taking the size of the GDP and public investment into account, the ranking according to Table 3.2 is: Finland, Sweden and Denmark. Institutional variables such as a corporatist style of policy making require discussion when explaining the comparatively low level of activity in these countries. Furthermore, privatization policies primarily focused on assets in the field of ‘natural monopolies’ or ‘network industries’ such as roads and railways, ports, airlines, power generation and distribution, water and sewage, and telecommunications (Köthenbürger 2006: xvi). Thus, the following chapter aims to explore similarities and differences within this group of rather reluctant PPP users. While a consensus orientation is a common feature of Nordic party systems, it is stronger in Danish politics than in Finland and Sweden, leading to a high degree of institutional stability and continuity. Similar to Sweden, minority governments occur quite often in Denmark. The weak parliamentary basis of coalition governments as well as the high parliamentary fragmentation makes quick policy changes less likely. They also contribute to a strong legislature (or weak executive) in terms of Lijphart’s (1999) legislative–executive dimension.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.