The Politics of Public–Private Partnerships in Western Europe
Show Less

The Politics of Public–Private Partnerships in Western Europe

Comparative Perspectives

Thomas Krumm

This comprehensive book provides a comparative policy analysis of public-private partnerships in 14 Western European countries from Scandinavia to Greece, bringing together insights from government, economics and politics. Thomas Krumm describes and analyses the forms and extents of collaboration between the state and private sector organisations, focusing on political drivers for a policy change in favour of PPP and the supportive and limiting socioeconomic and institutional conditions. Using comparative data, the author charts key policies and actors involved in supporting collaboration between the state and private business organisations across these countries.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 6: Belgium and the Netherlands

Thomas Krumm


This group consists of two very different countries, e.g. in terms of both federal–unitary structures and also PPP activities. In Belgium, the regions play an important role in policy making, whereas the Netherlands has unitary structures. There, the push for public sector modernization has had a huge impact on the adoption of the PPP approach. Furthermore, public tendering in the ‘Benelux’ countries is also known for its transparency and standardized procedures, which might reduce the chances of alternative methods such as PPPs. At central level, the Belgian federal government was very reluctant towards adopting PPP; at regional level, Flanders was the most active jurisdiction. Among the 14 states in our sample, the Belgian polity is the most volatile. The federalization of Belgium began in the 1970s and has not yet come to a standstill. After almost every federal election, the coalition negotiations led to a further step of institutional reform, with an overall tendency to transfer powers to the regional level. At regional level there is a unique feature: there are two state entities for each of the two main language groups, one in charge of cultural and social matters (the communities) and one in charge of territorial matters (the regions). This functional split results from the incongruence of territorial and cultural lines of separation (Krumm 2015). The ‘cleavage’ of Flemish and francophone identities shapes most areas of Belgian politics.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.