A Guidance Book for Lawyers, Legislators and Regulators
Legal, organizational or economic problems can create a need for empirical research, but often need to be ‘translated’ into research(able) problems. Take the issue of differences between geographic regions in a country when dealing with adopting and implementing forensic-technological innovations by law enforcement agencies. When these differences exist, they can lead not only to inequalities in terms of crime detection (or clearance) rates between regions, but also to inefficiencies in the operational activities of law enforcement agencies. That, in turn, can contribute to debates about how innovative certain regions are, who are the ‘early adopters’ and who the ‘laggards’, and why that is. Such a situation can lead to the following research problem: What are the indicators of differences in the adoption (rate) of technological-forensic innovations like the ‘lab on a chip’ and ‘automatic number plate recognition’ (ANPR), how do regions in country X differ in adoption (rates), how can these differences be explained and what will be the consequences for law enforcement in this country? A second example concerns the problem that some public sector organizations are confronted with more fraud and corruption than others. Fraud and corruption are societal problems that have (strong) moral and legal connotations.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.