Edited by Robert Geyer and Paul Cairney
Chapter 7: The policymaker’s complexity toolkit
As discussed in the introductory chapter, one of complexity theory’s most useful contributions to policymaking and implementation may be the provision of a unifying language between different disciplines and professions, between ‘theorists’ and ‘practitioners’. Whilst not quite yet the ‘Esperanto’ of scientific and social enquiry (Lissack, 1999), the framing of concepts with similar phraseology, models and conceptual metaphors might help both policymakers and practitioners communicate more effectively and begin to promote a common understanding of approaches to enquiry and policy implementation across disciplinary and cultural boundaries (Klein, 2004; Cooper et al., 2004; Price, 2005). Indeed contributors to this chapter come from different disciplines within one academic institution and have all found ‘complexity’ to be a commonly understood framework (if not completely uniformly interpreted), through which productive conversations regarding policy and practice can occur. We introduce the Brighton Complex Systems Toolkit (CSTK, 2012) to represent an example of successful collaborative practice, and frame a modified version as a suggested ‘Complex Practice Toolkit’, advocating a complexity approach, informed by an ‘evolutionary’ discourse, for both policymakers and those implementing policy (practitioners).
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.