Handbook of the International Political Economy of Migration
Show Less

Handbook of the International Political Economy of Migration

Edited by Leila Simona Talani and Simon McMahon

This Handbook discusses theoretical approaches to migration studies in general, as well as confronting various issues in international migration from a distinctive international political economy perspective. It examines migration as part of a global political economy whilst addressing the theoretical debate relating to the capacity of the state to control international migration and the so called ‘policy gap’ or ‘gap hypothesis’ between migration policies and their outcomes.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 10: The expat-sensitive state? Globalization, development, and the shifting loci of transmigrant resources

William J. Haller


There is no comprehensive inventory of the various policies of migrant sending states towards their expat nationals living and working overseas in the academic literature. Likewise, there is very little systematic cross-national analysis of their evolution, application and effectiveness. There have been positions staked out by various policy analysts on the impact of emigration on development processes and prospects of migrant sending countries such as ‘brain drain’ (e.g. Bhagwati and Hamada 1974; Adams 2003; Beine et al. 2001) and ‘brain circulation’ (e.g., Saxenian 2002, 2005; Tung 2008), particularly as regards migrant remittances. During the past 20 years, the volume of remittances to developing economies has grown sixfold, from $56 billion in 1995 to $334 billion in 2010 (UNDP 2011), not including the share of unrecorded remittance flows transferred via informal economic channels (IOM 2013). These figures now surpass intergovernmental foreign aid transfers and, for some countries, represent their single largest source of capital inflows. A large literature has accumulated on the changing institution of the state under the evolving conditions of globalization. Since the 1990s various scholars have predicted the erosion of the state as an institutional form, resulting from the behavior of footloose capital relentlessly seeking the lowest rents, creating a downward spiral into a global tragedy of the commons; while others have claimed that the nation state as an institution has never been stronger and that we are now in the era of the nation state (Giddens 2008).

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.