Show Less
You do not have access to this content

Constitutional Law and Regionalism

A Comparative Analysis of Regionalist Negotiations

Vito Breda

This topical book analyses the practice of negotiating constitutional demands by regional and dispersed national minorities in eight multinational systems. It considers the practices of cooperation and litigation between minority groups and central institutions in Australia, Britain, Canada, New Zealand, Italy, Spain, and the U.S. and includes an evaluation of the implications of the recent Catalan, Puerto Rican and Scottish referenda. Ultimately, the author shows that a flexible constitution combined with a versatile constitutional jurisprudence tends to foster institutional cooperation and the recognition of the pluralistic nature of modern states
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 2: The UK: identity-based constitutional claims in a parliamentarian system

Vito Breda

Extract

In this chapter, I will discuss the process of the negotiation and accommodation of identity-based constitutional claims in the UK. Britain is a political union of four ethnic communities. These communities are the English, the Northern Irish (who are divided along sectarian lines), the Scottish and the Welsh. However, and until relatively recently, the ethnic claims of these communities had little constitutional relevance. Before 1998, the UK was constitutionally a unitary state like other regional systems such as that of neighbouring France. In less than two decades, however, the system of governance moved from the unitary model to a highly decentralized asymmetrical system of territorial governance. There are multiple factors that have driven and drive this transformative process; however, in this chapter, I will focus on those elements that influenced the negotiation between central and regional institutions and that have a general comparative interest. The first aspect, from a comparative perspective, is the flexibility of the Westminster Model that allowed for the development of a multitrack decentralization system. The UK adopts a bespoke version of the Westminster Model in which the UK parliament has absolute legislative supremacy. One of the effects of this legislative sovereignty is that parliament and regional parliament acting intra vires have a large margin of discretion in allocating rights and policy aims. This level of flexibility at central and regional level has been the proxy for an asymmetric institutional and administrative diversity that mirrors, at least in part, the British multinational social structure. The second distinctive aspect of UK devolution is the existence of several communication channels between regional and central institutions. Institutions such as the Sewel Convention have the role of coordinating day-to-day policies and also ensuring smooth operations between central and regional political institutions.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.