Intellectual Property, Entrepreneurship and Social Justice
Show Less

Intellectual Property, Entrepreneurship and Social Justice

From Swords to Ploughshares

Edited by Lateef Mtima

In the Information Age, historically marginalized groups and developing nations continue to strive for socio-economic empowerment within the global community. Their ultimate success largely depends upon their ability to develop, protect, and exploit their greatest natural resource: intellectual property. Through an exploration of the techniques used in social entrepreneurship, Intellectual Property, Entrepreneurship and Social Justice provides a framework by which historically marginalized communities and developing nations can cooperate with the developed world to establish a socially cohesive global intellectual property order. The knowledgeable contributors discuss, in four parts, topics surrounding entrepreneurship and empowerment, education and advocacy, engagement and activism and, finally, commencement.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 11: Accentuate the positive, eliminate the negative: Intellectual property social justice and best practices for entrepreneurial economic development

Llewellyn Joseph Gibbons


Whether the modern-international intellectual property regime promotes innovation and economic progress in developing countries is passionately contested from differing perspectives of the ideological divide. It is relatively uncontroversial that every country that has achieved a developed industrial economy did so by free riding on the intellectual property of citizens of more developed countries. Lamentably, these same acts, by currently developing nations, are now castigated as intellectual property piracy because global norms of intellectual property have shifted dramatically in the past 50 years. One of the effects of the World Trade Organization (WTO) and the Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property (TRIPS) on developing economies was to effectively close off the legal unlicensed uses of technology as one possible avenue to economic development. Most recently, an equally important, if not more important factor has been the increased use of bilateral free-trade agreements, so-called TRIPS plus agreements, between developed and developing countries which further limit a developing country’s discretion in creating domestic pro-development intellectual property policies and in balancing competing national interests in fiscal and other public policies. At best, it is debatable whether developing countries, especially the least developed countries (LDCs), received any benefit from the Faustian bargain of trading enforceable domestic intellectual property law and policies for a vague, unenforceable promise of technology transfer from the most developed countries.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.