Regulatory Worlds
Show Less

Regulatory Worlds

Cultural and Social Perspectives when North Meets South

Mark Findlay and Lim Si Wei

This ambitious book takes up the grand challenge to design regulatory thinking for a global future beyond wealth and growth, and towards social sustainability. Assuming a ‘South World’ perspective on market regulation and social sustainability, the authors present the options and possibilities for radically repositioning regulatory principle.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 2: Redirecting analytical focus – South to North Worlds

Mark Findlay and Lim Si Wei


In the preceding chapter we called for a redirection in regulatory principle that can be understood against imperatives for social sustainability ahead of economic growth and individualized wealth creation. In the context of contemporary global crises we see this and an inevitable repositioning of economic imperatives within social worlds experiencing severe strain. This chapter lays out the methodological pathways (and a few hurdles in the path) to evaluating and charting this process of redirection, specifically through reversing the direction of critical gaze. Our analytical interest in regulatory principle emerged initially in trying to understand why global and regional regulatory discourse is focused on the global North/West, and what influence any such predisposition has over understanding regulatory problems in the South/East World. Taking our enquiry beyond revealing the misunderstandings of South World regulatory failure and governance needs (discussed in chapter 6), this chapter suggests employing regulatory principle to reveal the weaknesses of the North World regulatory state model which has made regulators too often blind and deaf to the problems underpinning negative comparisons South to North. In particular, the chapter will argue that breaking free of the regulatory state referent when approaching South World regulatory (and broader social) conditions would serve as a starting point in identifying the limitations of the regulatory literature as it currently stands.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.