Edited by Jac C. Heckelman and Nicholas R. Miller
Chapter 7: Supermajority rules
In the early twelfth century Catholic popes were elected by unanimity rule. The Catholic Church believed God had one will and unanimity rule was the only way the cardinals would find that will. However, disagreements over the proper person to serve as pope often produced turmoil. In several cases, the cardinals could not reach unanimous decisions, causing them to break into factions and elect two popes: a pope and an anti-pope. The frequency of such conflicts led Pope Alexander III (himself competing with an anti-pope) to abandon unanimity rule in 1179, in favor of a two-thirds rule. The lower threshold made it easier for the cardinals to elect a single pope representing a united church. Rather than reduce the threshold of affirmative votes further to, say, majority rule, in 1274 the Church locked the cardinals in conclave and did not let them out until they made a united decision. This placed the cost of indecision more squarely on the cardinals and inhibited their attempts to find kings to support them as dissident popes. Electing popes by two-thirds of the cardinals secluded in conclave remains the method used today (Colomer 2001).
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.