Risk and EU law
Show Less

Risk and EU law

Edited by Hans-W. Micklitz and Takis Tridimas

Risk and EU Law considers the multiple reasons for the increase in the types and diversity of risks, as well as the potential magnitude of their undesirable effects. The book identifies such reasons as; the openness of liberal societies; market competition; the constant endeavour to innovate; as well as globalization and the impact of new technologies. It also explores topics surrounding the social epistemology of risk observation and management, the role of science in political and judicial decision-making and transnational risk regulation and contractual governance.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 6: EU risk regulation: the role of science in political and judicial decision-making

Marjolein B.A. van Asselt and Ellen Vos


The major institutional shortcomings of European Union (EU) (and national) decision-making that were revealed by the BSE (or ‘mad cow’) and other food crises made clear that the EU is faced with a predominant concern as to how to make decisions in situations of risks and uncertainty. These crises forced the EU to drastically reform both its foundations and its institutional arrangements pertaining to food safety and more generally risk regulation. Without doubt, they emphasized and made visible that governance of uncertain risks is difficult, and inherently political. New approaches introduced by the EU in the aftermath of these crises have therefore sought to repair alleged deficiencies in EU risk regulation. The reforms thus introduced a clearer separation between risk assessment and risk management, particularly expressed by the creation of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), and a clarification of the distinct roles of scientists and decision-makers, the precautionary principle, and increased transparency and participation in the science-based decision-making on food. How to deal responsibly with situations in which there are suspicions that hazards may exist, although (sufficient) scientific or historical evidence for them is lacking, is in fact the key question that can be derived from Ulrich Beck’s agenda-setting critique and provoking notion of ‘organized irresponsibility’. Over time, his plea has been reinforced by interdisciplinary risk research. Not surprisingly therefore, prominent risk scholars have indicated that dealing with ‘uncertain risks’ is a major challenge in contemporary societies.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.