Risk and EU law
Show Less

Risk and EU law

Edited by Hans-W. Micklitz and Takis Tridimas

Risk and EU Law considers the multiple reasons for the increase in the types and diversity of risks, as well as the potential magnitude of their undesirable effects. The book identifies such reasons as; the openness of liberal societies; market competition; the constant endeavour to innovate; as well as globalization and the impact of new technologies. It also explores topics surrounding the social epistemology of risk observation and management, the role of science in political and judicial decision-making and transnational risk regulation and contractual governance.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 10: Financial crises and global financial regulation

Christopher Kobrak and Donald Brean


The purpose of this chapter is to assess the international regulatory response to the 2008 Financial Panic and to suggest some reasons for an apparent disconnect between rhetoric and reality. We conclude that considering the gravity of the crisis and the promises made by politicians, the regulatory response has been less robust than promised. Many of the key pre-2008 regulatory approaches and even gatekeepers remain unaltered. Continuity rather than discontinuity better describes our financial architecture since the crisis. In our search for explanations, we observe that some of the most important financial individuals and institutions failed to see the crisis coming, believing that banks’ managers were sufficiently well informed and the banks sufficiently well capitalized to grasp and cope with their risks. We argue that major portions of our financial architecture – at least two that are considered major causes of the crisis – are still with us; indeed, may have gotten worse since the crisis. We suggest that the problems require a more serious, cross-border approach, but that this approach is still hindered by national political agendas and legal impediments. At the time of writing, 70 years after the Bretton Woods Conference, which tried to correct the financial failures of the first half of the 20th century, the worst crisis since the Great Depression has not led to a new consensus and greater sense of urgency about macroeconomic and regulatory policy; one that recognizes the need to find a new synthesis of national and international aspirations, for which Bretton Woods is rightly famous.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.