Research Handbook on EU Labour Law
Show Less

Research Handbook on EU Labour Law

Edited by Alan Bogg, Cathryn Costello and A. C.L. Davies

Research Handbook on EU Labour Law features contributions from leading scholars in the field. Part I addresses cross-cutting themes, such as the relationship between EU law and national law, the role of human rights in EU labour law, and the impact of austerity measures. In Part II, the contributors focus on topics in individual and collective labour law at EU level, including working time and job security. Finally, Part III offers a comprehensive overview of the EU’s interventions in equality law.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 17: Religion and equality in multicultural workplaces: Human rights and anti-discrimination discourses in EU law

Diamond Ashiagbor

Extract

How does, or should, European Union labour law structure the enquiry into the nature of equality rights in the workplace – in particular, into the role of religion and the conceptualisation of race – given the relevance of two potentially competing discourses, on human rights and anti-discrimination? The focus of this chapter will be on the interaction within EU law between two discourses or normative orders which speak to the recognition of identity-based rights in the workplace: human rights norms, which seek to guarantee ‘freedoms’ such as freedom of religion, and anti-discrimination norms which aim to achieve equality. The Court of Justice of the European Union serves as a location for both forms of action or types of analysis, though it is arguably more at ease with the latter. Indeed the Court of Justice is particularly attuned to anti-discrimination discourses which, in the EU context, take their inspiration not only from the idea of equality as a ‘universal’ right, but also from the instrumental concern to ensure market integration and economic activity unimpeded by discrimination. In contrast, the discourse of human rights within civil society, concerned to ensure freedom from state interference (whilst also including the state’s obligation to ensure a legal framework within which private actors do not violate the human rights of individuals or groups), is one in which the Court of Justice has traditionally deferred to the jurisprudence of a more specialised human rights court, the European Court of Human Rights.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.