Handbook of Sustainability Assessment
Show Less

Handbook of Sustainability Assessment

Edited by Angus Morrison-Saunders, Jenny Pope and Alan Bond

The Handbook of Sustainability Assessment introduces the theory and practice of sustainability assessment and showcases the state-of-the-art research. The aim is to provide inspiration and guidance to students, academics and practitioners alike and to contribute to the enhancement of sustainability assessment practice worldwide. It emphasises how traditional impact assessment practices can be enhanced to contribute to sustainable outcomes. Featuring original contributions from leading sustainability assessment researchers and practitioners, it forms part of the Research Handbooks on Impact Assessment series.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 4: Equity in sustainability assessment: a conceptual framework

Lydia Lamorgese and Davide Geneletti


Sustainability assessment seeks ways to achieve development paths that meet ‘fundamental human needs while preserving the life-support systems of planet Earth’ (Kates et al., 2001, p. 641, 2005, p. 20). Hence, one hallmark of sustainability is equity, which in its simplest conception concerns the distribution of the benefits for current and future generations of people affected by a decision. In the sustainability debate equity considerations have been most commonly expressed in terms of inter-and intra-generational equity (e.g. Padilla, 2002; Gibson et al., 2005; Brandon and Lombardi, 2010). Broadly speaking, intra-and inter-generational equity refer, respectively, to transactions of rights between people of the same generation and across generations. Even if there is a strong consciousness of equity issues, equity is rarely incorporated into sustainability assessment and decision making in a formal way (Halpern et al., 2013). We identified three obstacles to this incorporation. First, the concept of equity is not univocally understood and defined, but reflects a multifaceted variety of ethical beliefs, associated also with the interpretation of the concept of ‘justice’. Distinguishing between equity and justice can be problematic, and we do not attempt here to dwell on the differences between the two terms.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.