- Rethinking Law series
Chapter 5: Six pennies for your thoughts: Freund v. Washington Square Press
AbstractAfter the publisher reneged on a promise to publish, the author sued and won. However, he was only awarded nominal damages, six cents. The case stands for the proposition that speculative damages would not be awarded. This chapter examines the author’s damage theories. Analysis of the record reveals that his most plausible claim, for lost royalties, was never submitted to any court. The contract should have been interpreted as giving the publisher an option to publish with the price being the author’s advance. The breach would have been the publisher’s refusal to return the manuscript to the author.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.