Neither Free Trade Nor Protection
Show Less

Neither Free Trade Nor Protection

A Critical Political Economy of Trade Theory and Practice

Bill Dunn

This book challenges both sides of the debate around international trade. Most mainstream economists advocate free trade as a mainstay of national and global prosperity. Meanwhile, many critics see trade causing inequality and poverty. Unfortunately, supporters and opponents share many assumptions about trade and the character of the international economy and produce similarly abstract and asocialized theories. Their propositions need to be investigated critically, and in doing so, this book begins the task of assessing when and how trade matters.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 9: Trade opening and the decline of industrial action

Bill Dunn


This chapter investigates the relationship between trade opening and the situation of labour, focusing particularly on the decline of industrial action. A rich literature describes multidimensional processes of change but in both academic and popular accounts ‘globalization’ is typically blamed for many of labour’s problems. The prospects of labour acting as an independent political or social agent have either dropped off the agenda or, where they are discussed, are overwhelmingly rejected. Much as with questions of rising inequality and trade discussed in the last chapter, there is at least coincidence. In recent decades, many countries have become more open and have seen falling levels of industrial action. However, this apparent association warrants careful critical investigation for several reasons. As was stressed at the end of the last chapter, social practices are complex and contested, likely to be influenced by economic changes but not determined by them in any straightforward way. Claims of labour’s structural weakness are intensely and inescapably political and labour’s opponents have vested interests in overstating the case, insisting that there is no alternative and that economic change means that resistance is now futile. The idea of ‘globalization’ is extensively debated and contested. It means different things to different people, if it means anything at all. Therefore, if something called ‘globalization’ is taken to have weakened labour it is necessary to enquire more closely into exactly what mechanisms and what particular processes this is supposed to have involved.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.