Neither Free Trade Nor Protection
Show Less

Neither Free Trade Nor Protection

A Critical Political Economy of Trade Theory and Practice

Bill Dunn

This book challenges both sides of the debate around international trade. Most mainstream economists advocate free trade as a mainstay of national and global prosperity. Meanwhile, many critics see trade causing inequality and poverty. Unfortunately, supporters and opponents share many assumptions about trade and the character of the international economy and produce similarly abstract and asocialized theories. Their propositions need to be investigated critically, and in doing so, this book begins the task of assessing when and how trade matters.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 11: Conclusions

Bill Dunn


At first sight the conclusions of this book might seem unsatisfying. There are problems with all the theories and much of the evidence is inconclusive. That is really the point, that a properly critical understanding of trade should not expect neat answers. The evidence suggests that none of the most influential theories, from the beguiling elegance of comparative advantage through to ideas of monopoly and imperfect competition to the opposite pole of unequal exchange and the systematic disadvantage to poorer countries that it posits, provide much help in understanding the complexity of observed patterns of trade. There is evidence that trade is positively associated with growth, albeit neither the levels nor the statistical association warrant economists’ general enthusiasm. Meanwhile, if there is a systematic disadvantage to poorer countries or to primary product exporters, or reciprocally if there is an advantage to rich countries or manufactured commodity exporters, this struggles to emerge from the evidence. At the very least, any such effects were being veiled, presumably by other, stronger economic forces. The book was able to report some interesting and clearly positive results. For example, at least until the 2000s, trade deficits appear to have been conducive to faster national growth, indicating that a pervasive prejudice in favour of trade surpluses is misplaced. Countries do tend to trade, particularly to trade primary products, on the basis of their ‘factor endowments’ as predicted by the neo-classical Heckscher–Ohlin theorem.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.