Research Handbook on Jurisdiction and Immunities in International Law
Show Less

Research Handbook on Jurisdiction and Immunities in International Law

Edited by Alexander Orakhelashvili

This Research Handbook provides a comprehensive and up-to-date analysis of the international law of jurisdiction and immunities, illustrating those aspects in which the law of jurisdiction and law of immunities are mutually interdependent, as well as shedding light on the implications of that interdependence. With authoritative contributions from recognized experts, it offers an impartial perspective on the applicable international law, independent from any positions held in governmental or other institutional circles.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 9: Treaties on state immunity: the 1972 and 2004 Conventions

Alexander Orakhelashvili


Treaties on the subject matter of state immunity purport to introduce discrete legal frameworks to bind their states parties to a particular legal approach on this subject matter. Yet, the low participation of states in these treaties is a matter that cannot be overlooked. The 1972 European Convention on State Immunity is in force as between eight states only; while the 2004 UN Convention on Jurisdictional Immunities of States and Their Property is not in force yet, and it is uncertain when it will be. An issue different from the normative content and status of these instruments is the political and ideological suitability of these instruments in terms of a particular vision of state immunity, especially for granting immunity to states for serious human rights violations. The proper understanding of the structure and content of these two treaties may be of assistance towards enhancing our understanding as to whether these instruments legally assist that political and ideological agenda or merely provide a political cover to do certain things in a certain manner. This could help to clarify the question as to whether and to what extent international lawyers’ minds should be so strongly preoccupied with these instruments. The enthusiasm about both Conventions has been quite widespread. The 1972 Convention has been repeatedly used in judicial practice. Similarly, the adoption of the 2004 UN Convention was met with significant initial enthusiasm, hailing the 2004 Convention as an important document and a ‘great achievement’.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.