Edited by Alexander Orakhelashvili
Chapter 12: Immunity from execution
It should not be assumed that, once a court has denied immunity to a defendant foreign state and decided that that foreign state lost the case, the claimant can simply go ahead and attach the assets of that foreign state to execute the judgment. Owing to historical reasons, particularly to the incremental nature of the process whereby the former absolute immunity doctrine was replaced by the now prevailing doctrine of restrictive immunity, there has been established in current law on state immunity a clear distinction between the issues related to the adjudicative process and those related to the process of enforcement and execution. To start with, three rules can be briefly noted here. First and foremost, a loss of immunity at the adjudicative stage does not automatically lead to a loss of immunity from enforcement and execution; second, enforcement or execution is permissible only with regard to property used for commercial or private purposes but not against property used for sovereign or public purposes; finally, certain categories of state property, such as diplomatic and military property, enjoy absolute immunity from execution.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.