Research Handbook on Human Rights and Intellectual Property
Show Less

Research Handbook on Human Rights and Intellectual Property

Edited by Christophe Geiger

Research Handbook on Human Rights and Intellectual Property is a comprehensive reference work on the intersection of human rights and intellectual property law. Resulting from a field-specific expertise of over 40 scholars and professionals of world renown, the book explores the practical and doctrinal implications of human rights on intellectual property law and jurisprudence. In particular, the chapters scrutinize issues related to interactions among and between norms of different legal families, the role of human rights in development of the balanced intellectual property legal framework, standing case-law of national and regional courts and intellectual property offices reconciling overlapping rights and obligations, and identify the practical significance of different human rights for the exercise of intellectual property rights.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 12: Intellectual property in decisions of national Constitutional Courts in Europe

Thomas Dreier and Marco Ganzhorn


The topic ‘Intellectual property in decisions of national Constitutional Courts in Europe’ is, on the one hand, rather broad, since it covers all ‘intellectual property rights’ without distinction. Yet, it may well be that from a constitutional law point of view, different intellectual property (IP) rights are to be treated differently. Moreover, the reference in the title to decisions of ‘national constitutional courts in Europe’ refers to the multitude of constitutional courts in the currently 28 Member States of the EU. On the other hand, this chapter is also somewhat narrow, since it is not about the intersection of IP laws and constitutional law in general, but only addresses constitutional law issues that have been raised in front of, and decided by national constitutional courts. In this respect, a further limitation lies in the fact that the decisions to be discussed here are only those of national ‘constitutional’ courts, even if national general courts may likewise be in a position to address constitutional issues regarding IP law. Finally, another limitation of the subject at issue resides in the fact that only ‘European’ constitutional courts shall be looked at, rather than all constitutional courts worldwide. One of the reasons to look at how IP has been discussed in decisions by European constitutional courts is, of course, that in general a marked difference can be found between continental European constitutional law theory and practice on the one hand, and constitutional law theory and practice in States of the common law tradition.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.