Chapter 5: A theory of weak judicial review
AbstractAlthough the book mounts a general attack against strong constitutional review in Chapter Three, it does not reject the idea that judges should have a role in the specification of rights. The main purpose of the present chapter is, therefore, to outline a theory of weak constitutional review. It is argued that the strength of a constitutional court is a multidimensional concept and has to be analysed accordingly. The book uses the term ‘weak judicial review’ as a broad umbrella concept and distinguishes three subtypes of it: limited, penultimate and deferential review. It also compares the strengths and weaknesses of the different forms of weak judicial review and evaluates them in light of the normative principles that are spelled out in the earlier chapters of the book.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.