The Political Economy of WTO Implementation and China’s Approach to Litigation in the WTO
Show Less

The Political Economy of WTO Implementation and China’s Approach to Litigation in the WTO

Yenkong Ngangjoh Hodu and Zhang Qi

The concept of compliance of World Trade Organization law as part of international economic law is examined in this discerning book. The issue of compliance is examined through a broad perspective, considering the key conceptual issues which continue to dominate debate around contemporary world trade rule-making. In view of China's in shaping the political economy of the world trading system, this book places discussion within context of Chinese Confucian values
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 2: The evolution of the GATT/WTO dispute settlement system

Yenkong Ngangjoh Hodu and Zhang Qi


In the light of the nexus that exists between institutional dispute settlement and the debate on compliance, this section discusses the relevance of introducing dispute settlement provisions in international economic agreements. The proliferation of international trade and investment agreements in recent decades has led to a series of fragmented dispute resolution facilities. Although almost all regional, bilateral or multilateral agreements, whatever their nature, endorse peaceful settlement of disputes as an important aspect of the agreement in question, the true meaning of what constitutes a dispute for the purpose of dispute settlement has been subject to disagreement. The first very general definition of dispute in this field is to be found in the Mavrommatis Palestine Concessions case where the Permanent Court of International Justice (PCIJ) stated that ‘[a] dispute is a disagreement on a point of law or fact, a conflict of legal views or of interests between two persons’. And 26 years later the International Court of Justice (ICJ) defined a dispute as ‘a situation in which the two sides held clearly opposite views concerning the question of the performance or non-performance of certain treaty obligations’. Consequently, determination of the existence of a dispute is important in the delimitation of the contours of the application of a particular dispute settlement mechanism. A dispute arising from an international instrument is, therefore, generally seen as a disagreement between two or more entities – typically, but not exclusively, states – over the interpretation and application of the international instrument in question.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.