Leaks, Whistleblowing and the Public Interest
Show Less

Leaks, Whistleblowing and the Public Interest

The Law of Unauthorised Disclosures

Ashley Savage

This book is the first of its kind to provide an in-depth treatment of the law of unauthorised disclosures in the United Kingdom. Drawing upon extensive data obtained using freedom of information as a methodology and examples from comparative jurisdictions, the book considers the position of civil servants, employees of the security and intelligence services and service personnel in the armed forces. It considers the protections available, the consequences of leaking and a full assessment of the authorised alternatives.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 2: The consequences of making an unauthorised disclosure

Ashley Savage


Secrecy can be used to safeguard national security but it can also be used as a tool to hide deception. Secrecy comes at a price. There is an inevitable imbalance between the executive, who are considered to be best placed to determine risks to national security, and the state who need a degree of access to official information to be informed, active participants in a democratic society. The Freedom of Information Act 2000 was intended to redress the balance. However, the resulting Act is subject to a number of exemptions. Government departments can frustrate the process further by choosing to delay responses. As citizens suffer from the effects of imbalance in the extramural community, Crown servants likewise encounter imbalances in their respective intramural communities. Crown servants in the Civil Service, Armed Forces, police and security and intelligence agencies are subject to Official Secrets Act 1989, section 12. Whilst other Crown servants must seek authorisation to disclose official information, Ministers are self-authorising. All Crown servants undergo some form of security vetting before they can begin employment and access official documents, Ministers are not vetted. The maintenance of secrecy at ministerial level is therefore reliant upon a degree of trust, self-responsibility, and for those with a seat in Cabinet, membership of the Privy Council. This archaic remnant of the United Kingdom’s monarchical system requires an oath of allegiance to the Queen – those in breach of the oath could until 1999 be tried for treason.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.