Perspectives on Contemporary Professional Work
Show Less

Perspectives on Contemporary Professional Work

Challenges and Experiences

Edited by Adrian Wilkinson, Donald Hislop and Christine Coupland

How is the world of professions and professional work changing? This book offers both an overview of current debates surrounding the nature of professional work, and the implications for change brought about by the managerialist agenda. The relationships professionals have with their organizations are variable, indeterminate and uncertain, and there is still debate over the ways in which these should be characterized and theorized. The contributors discuss these implications with topics including hybrid organizations and hybrid professionalism; the changing nature of professional and managerial work; profession and identity; and the emergence of HRM as a new managerial profession.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 14: HRM as an emerging new managerial profession

Paul Higgins, Ian Roper and Sophie Gamwell


Human resource management (HRM) is an emerging ‘managerial profession’. Managerial professions are hybrid occupations claiming some attributes from traditional ‘occupational professions’ but also deviating from them on others. From classical studies it is acknowledged that there are tensions between managers and professionals (Weber, 1978): managers desire accountability to organizational objectives and professionals desire autonomy to pursue some ‘higher’ objective. However, the boundaries have never been fixed. In recent decades a number of authors have observed traditional professions becoming more accountable – and similar – to managerial sources of authority (Flynn, 1999; Exworthy and Halford, 1999; Dent and Whitehead, 2002). In contrast, HR practitioners could be said to be moving in the opposite direction: as a managerial function redefining itself into a profession. This chapter will examine HRM as a managerial profession, identifying important tensions in the nature of work in this particular managerial function. In particular, four dilemmas are proposed which intersect the literature both on professions and on HRM. These dilemmas are: (1) the degree of autonomy that is appropriate – or possible – in dealing with various organizational stakeholder interests; (2) balancing the desire to have an influence on strategic issues while retaining a claim to organization expertise in core HR activities; (3) ascertaining the scope of discretion in the HR practitioner’s expertise compared to its operational authority; and (4) whose interests does – or should – HR be working for? In examining the four dilemmas the chapter makes an important contribution to the literature on professions and to the specific study of HR professionalization.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.