Edited by Harry W. Richardson, Jiyoung Park, James E. Moore II and Qisheng Pan
Many economists and planners are interested in evaluating the socioeconomic impacts of various disruptions. Occasionally, they use geographically detailed input-output (IO) models. Isard demonstrated as early as 1951 that traditional (national) IO models are inadequate because they cannot capture the effects of linkages and interactions among regions. To examine the full (short-term) impacts of unexpected events, such as terrorist attacks or natural disasters on the US economy, the economic links among states should be considered. Multiregional input-output models (MRIOs) include interregional trade tables and avoid some of the problems associated with excessive aggregation. Building an operational MRIO for all the states of the United States, however, requires highly detailed interstate shipments data. Although Chenery (1953) and Moses (1955) had formulated relatively simplified MRIO frameworks in response to the earlier discussions by Isard (1951), data problems persisted and have stymied most applications. The non-existence or rarity of useful interregional trade data is the most problematic issue. Intraregional and interregional data must be comparable and compatible, yet the currently available shipments data between states are only sporadically available and difficult to use.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.