The State Court Perspective
A precise definition of the term “judicial power” is difficult to come by in large measure because the exercise of such power is so dependent on its constitutional, political and cultural context. Yet in a larger sense, how a state or a nation defines this term has tremendous implications on the authority of the courts in relationship to specific cases and their larger governmental role. So contextual is this term, that it is often defined by judges either in reference to inclusive case considerations of what it is, e.g., “each and every type of case or controversy defined as part of the judicial power” excluding cases deemed to be trivial, or in reference to more philosophical considerations for what it is, e.g., “a judicial act seems to be an act done by competent authority, upon consideration of facts and circumstances, and imposing liability or affecting the rights of others,” or in reference to what might be called the “soup bowl” definition, e.g., the “authority or capacity which is necessary or proper to render it [judicial power] effective”.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.