Global Shock, Risks, and Asian Financial Reform
Show Less

Global Shock, Risks, and Asian Financial Reform

Edited by Iwan J. Azis and Hyun S. Shin

The growth of financial markets has clearly outpaced the development of financial market regulations. With growing complexity in the world of finance and the resultant higher frequency of financial crises, all eyes have shifted toward the current inadequacy of financial regulation. This book expertly examines what this episode means for Asia’s financial sector and its stability, and what the implications will be for the region’s financial regulation. By focusing on legal and institutional frameworks the book also elaborates on various issues and challenges in terms of how financial liberalization can maximize the benefits and minimize the risks of crisis.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 17: Global financial regulatory trends and challenges for the development of the insurance and pensions sector in the Asia-Pacific region

Arup Chatterjee


The 2008–09 global financial crisis has prompted wide-ranging regulatory reforms to be undertaken by the international community to strengthen the resilience of the global financial sector. Some of the activities of the insurance and private pensions sector, which was relatively less affected by the crisis than other financial sectors, under certain conditions have the potential to be systemically relevant if conducted on a huge scale and with poor risk governance and supervisory oversight. Such non-core activities are closer to quasi-banking and include speculative derivatives trading on non-insurance firm balance sheets and the mismanagement of short-term funding. Therefore, the insurance industry can be considered systemically important. The regulatory reforms that have been unleashed are a part of important initiatives to reformulate the future landscape for finance, including the IAIS’s Insurance Core Principles (IAIS 2011a), the EU’s Solvency II Directive, and Basel III capital adequacy requirements. The identification of global systemically important insurers (G-SIIs) and the supervision of internationally active insurance groups (IAIGs) is also likely to place additional demands on regulators to address sub-optimal supervisory structures and prudential issues such as enhanced risk-based capital frameworks, and place greater regulatory focus on policyholder compensation schemes, group-wide supervision, and more coordinated resolution mechanisms.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.