Governance of Intellectual Property Rights in China and Europe
Show Less

Governance of Intellectual Property Rights in China and Europe

Edited by Nari Lee, Niklas Bruun and Mingde Li

Intellectual property law performs a number of complex functions in society. To foster innovation and creativity in a society, governments are actively using intellectual property law as a means of governance. Both in China and in Europe, intellectual property law is used to further innovation and cultural policies to increase national competitiveness in a global economy. Due to its impact on global trade, intellectual property laws are increasingly made and influenced by international norms. Against the backdrop of this dynamic global intellectual property norm competition and interaction, this book explores governance of intellectual property rights in China and Europe. This book examines and compares the series of intellectual property law and system reforms in China and Europe. Through the analysis, this book argues that a successful governance of intellectual property rights require not only the adoption of a set of norms but also transformation of the perspectives and the implementing institutions.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 11: China’s CMC system and its problems from the Copyright Law of 1990 to its third amendment

Weiguang Wu


Since the coming into effect of the Regulation on the Collective Administration of Copyright (RCAC) in the year of 2005, a system for the collective management of copyright and related rights (CMC) has been formally established and implemented in China. Since then, several collective rights management organizations (CMOs) have been set up and collect levies separately according to the RCAC and their own by-laws. However China’s CMC system has seriously concerned academics and industries in recent years and these concerns have mainly focused on the following four issues: 1) Whether the CMC system is indispensable to China, especially in the information society? 2) Whether non-profitable organizations should be the only permitted CMOs in China? 3) Whether the statutory monopoly of and the use of blanket licenses by CMOs have ruined the ability of copyright holders to differentiate with the price of their works resulting in a loss of bargaining power as private rights for the right holders? 4) Whether, in the era of globalization and the information society, China’s CMC system should be reformed in accordance with international developments and the requirements of innovative business models in the era of the information society. This paper observes that the form of China’s statutory monopoly and non-profit CMC system has been in operation in many western developed countries for many years. This paper argues that this kind of CMC system has jeopardized the essence of copyright as a private right, impairing the fundamental rules of the market economy and stifling new innovative business models. The CMC system in China was quite new compared with those in operation in western developed countries. In comparison with the western experience of more than a hundred years, theory and practice of CMC have not yet fully developed in China. China’s CMC system is a simple institutional transplantation of the system used in continental European countries. Due to the fact that China is currently still constructing its CMC system, it should take the opportunity to adopt it to the recent development of an information society. However, it seems that this has not received specific consideration during the development of China’s CMC system over the past 10 years, including during the discussions regarding the third amendment of copyright law. When and how China’s CMC system will substantially meet the requirements of the Chinese market and match the features of the information society is still in question. This chapter is composed of four sections. In section 1, the definitions, types and functions of CMC organizations are outlined. In section 2, a brief introduction of China’s CMC system and its process of development are discussed. In section 3, the defects of China’s CMC system and its possible changes in the forthcoming third amendment of copyright law are analyzed. In section 4, the chapter concludes with the suggestion of adopting a competitive and market oriented CMC system in China.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.