Governance of Intellectual Property Rights in China and Europe
Show Less

Governance of Intellectual Property Rights in China and Europe

Edited by Nari Lee, Niklas Bruun and Mingde Li

Intellectual property law performs a number of complex functions in society. To foster innovation and creativity in a society, governments are actively using intellectual property law as a means of governance. Both in China and in Europe, intellectual property law is used to further innovation and cultural policies to increase national competitiveness in a global economy. Due to its impact on global trade, intellectual property laws are increasingly made and influenced by international norms. Against the backdrop of this dynamic global intellectual property norm competition and interaction, this book explores governance of intellectual property rights in China and Europe. This book examines and compares the series of intellectual property law and system reforms in China and Europe. Through the analysis, this book argues that a successful governance of intellectual property rights require not only the adoption of a set of norms but also transformation of the perspectives and the implementing institutions.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 12: Collective rights management in China and Europe: between market and authority

Nari Lee and Yang Li


The rapid pace of technological developments presents complexities for copyright law. The market for creative works and innovation is always undergoing changes. One result of concurrent changes in the dynamics of interdependent IP institutions is the emergences of new practices and entities that function within the traditional institutional boundaries, as well as in between. Both in Europe and in China, there are more IP rights covering innovations and creations that are privately held by so many different actors, with heterogeneous interests. To manage complex layers of rights and fragmented titles, various types of intermediaries are emerging. This chapter argues that collective management organisations (CMOs) seem to be one such organization that operates between the market and authorities in China. Commencing with a discussion of a recent Chinese dispute concerning the scope of collective administration agreements as an example, we compare how the relationship between CMOs and their members are regulated in China and in the EU. This chapter argues that the current Chinese CMO system seems to be failing in achieving the recognition necessary by the beneficiaries of such a system. The dispute also highlights that the successful implementation of a CMO requires that the perception held by all parties of CMOs are reconciled. We argue that, as CMOs provide a governance mechanism for exercising IP rights, it is important whether there is a vibrant market for copyright licences or not because this is a crucial consideration that enables a CMO to be successful. Without a healthy and functioning local market for content, a CMOs’ role is reduced to that of a collecting agency for a handful of foreign right-holders. We conclude that any proposal for future reform should consider that a successful and functional market with widely acceptable licensing practices is a crucial prerequisite for extending any operation of CMOs, such as extended collective licensing.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.