Edited by John B. Davis and Wilfred Dolfsma
Chapter 2: Institutions, culture and values
‘Institutions’, ‘culture’ and ‘values’ have, for more than a century, been key components of the discourse of the social sciences and of social economics. However, what is more interesting than continuity of usage are the great differences in the meaning and importance of the terms within a changing set of sub-discourses. These differences and their evolution will be the focus of this chapter. Across all of the scholarly discussions that I will describe below there is, and has been, a general understanding that institutions are social norms or patterns of action (behavior) and associated emic (which is to say native as opposed to analytical) understandings that vary across time and space. It is also generally agreed that cultures are conglomerations of institutions that are shared by a group of people. Values are aspects of cultures and of institutional patterns. From roughly 1870 to 1940, as the social sciences took their modern and academically organized form, institutions, cultures and values were defined primarily by methods of study. Working definitions were sufficient, given wide consensus about what it was right and important to do as social scientists. In the decades from 1940 until the end of the twentieth century, as this consensus disintegrated, more attention was given to formal definition of the key terms.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.