Genetics, Crime and Justice
Show Less

Genetics, Crime and Justice

Debra Wilson

As our understanding of genetics increases, its use in criminal justice becomes more attractive. This timely book examines the use of genetic information both in criminal investigations and during the trial process. It discusses current scientific understanding and considers some potential legal, ethical and sociological issues with the use of genetic information. Topics include rights of privacy and consent in obtaining DNA samples, evidentiary issues in court, the impact of genetic evidence on punishment theory and sentencing, and genetic discrimination.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details

Chapter 5: The ‘criminal gene’ argument in the courts

Debra Wilson

Extract

The previous chapter discussed several genes which have been associated with antisocial behavior. It considered the basic function of these genes, in order to explain the origin of this link, and then discussed scientific understanding of the role of these genes and their interaction with specific environmental conditions in human behavior. This chapter will consider the current use of a genetics arguments in court. It will begin by discussing the admissibility of behavioral genetic evidence, and will then consider its use during both the trial and the sentencing phase of court proceedings. In order for evidence to be considered by a judge or jury in criminal proceedings it must first be admissible. The starting point for admissibility is generally that evidence is admissible if it is relevant. ‘Relevant evidence’ can be defined as ‘evidence that, if it were accepted, could rationally affect (directly or indirectly) the assessment of the probability of the existence of a fact in issue in the proceeding’. An alternate definition is evidence which has ‘any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence [where] the fact is of consequence in determining the application’. One additional requirement is that the evidence must be based on conditions that existed at the time the cause of action arose. There is often a provision in evidence laws which allows for the exclusion of otherwise relevant evidence if its use would be unfair.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.