Litigation and Arbitration in EU Competition Law
Show Less

Litigation and Arbitration in EU Competition Law

Edited by Mel Marquis and Roberto Cisotta

With courts and arbitrators functioning daily as front line decision-makers applying EU competition law, this book reflects on a variety of issues related to the litigation and arbitration of cases in this field. It provides expert analysis from perspectives of substance, procedure, fundamental rights, as well as inter-institutional dialogue and coherence.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 14: Analysis of recent competition cases decided by arbitrators

Laura Bergamini


In recent years an increasing number of arbitral tribunals have been asked to interpret and apply competition law decisions by the European Commission. This new trend has emerged in the context of both international commercial arbitration and public international arbitration, and may grow stronger. This chapter examines two cases reflecting these developments: Reti Televisive Italiane v Sky Italia, and Electrabel S.A. v Hungary. Taken together, these cases illustrate some of the changes that can explain this new trend. They make it possible to start assessing how arbitral tribunals operating in different contexts have approached the same task, and how the Commission has approached arbitral proceedings where the implementation of its decisions was under scrutiny. Competition law issues are customarily raised in international commercial arbitration because parties often argue that a contract (or a clause thereof) is invalid on the ground that it runs counter to antitrust laws (for example, Articles 101 and 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, or ‘TFEU’). Until recently, arbitrators have generally addressed these issues before the European Commission (‘Commission’) issued a decision on the same facts. By contrast, public international tribunals have not traditionally dealt with competition law because disputes between States do not typically raise issues of this kind. This scenario seems to have evolved in the past 15 years. Specifically, an increasing number of arbitral tribunals are now being requested to interpret and apply Commission decisions.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.