Critical Reflections on Interactive Governance Self-organization and Participation in Public Governance
Self-organization and Participation in Public Governance
Edited by Jurian Edelenbos and Ingmar van Meerkerk
Chapter 17: Doing what’s necessary: how encounters in practice shape and improve interactive governance
AbstractBartels argues in Chapter 17 that interactive governance has rapidly been institutionalized in the public sector, but cannot guarantee productive dynamics and positive outcomes. He argues that making interactive governance work hinges on how it takes shape through encounters in daily practice. In their interactions, stakeholders can enact predetermined institutional interests, procedures and routines (logic of the organization) or engage in a process of discovering how best to address the needs and dynamics at hand (law of the situation). This framework is empirically grounded in and practically illustrated by the case of a Neighbourhood Practice Team in Amsterdam-West, the Netherlands. The analysis critically appraises its successful practice of ‘doing what’s necessary’: following the needs of the residents and the dynamics of the neighbourhood rather than abiding by pre-set interests, goals and procedures. Bartels explains how this works, what challenges it runs into, and why it makes a difference.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.