Show Less
You do not have access to this content

Bank Funding, Liquidity, and Capital Adequacy

A Law and Finance Approach

José Gabilondo

Focusing primarily on the banking system in the United States, this book offers an innovative framework that integrates a depository bank’s liquidity and its capital adequacy into a unified notion of funding that helps to explain how the 2007–2008 crisis unfolded, why central banks succeeded in resolving the crisis, and how the conceptual legacy of the crisis and its resolution led to lasting changes in bank funding regulation, including new objective requirements for bank liquidity. To provide a comparative context, the book also examines the funding models of non-bank intermediaries like dealer banks and insurers.
Show Summary Details

Appendix: A case study

José Gabilondo

Extract

To illustrate bank funding dynamics, this case study traces the balance sheet transformations of a hypothetical commercial bank – Acme – as it faces two routine funding challenges. First, the bank’s survival as a going concern turns on its money position. Second, the bank must also contend with threats to funding stability over the medium term caused by the maturing of large liabilities.Assume that Acme has common and preferred stock paying a quarterly dividend and some undivided profits from previous operations. This comprises the totality of Acme’s equity capital. Acme could do little if it used only owners’ capital. To increase the scale of its own investments, the bank borrows.Acme has two kinds of deposits: retail deposits and brokered deposits. These deposits present some liquidity risk because if Acme’s depositors decided to withdraw their deposits, the bank would have to come up with funds on very short notice to honor their withdrawal requests. Though deposit insurance makes a run on retail deposits unlikely, Acme must set aside some cash as a reserve against the risk of withdrawal by a depositor. Acme divides this reserve into vault cash and its reserve deposit at the Federal Reserve. Because Acme seeks yield by keeping its low-rate liquid assets to a minimum, its existing reserves do not meet the minimum reserve requirement established by federal law. To cover the deficit, Acme buys reserves from a commercial bank that has excess reserves, called federal funds. Like the retail deposits, this purchase of reserves is a liability because...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.