Understanding the Rise and Significance of a New Agenda
AbstractChapter 6 reflects on key controversies that are central to the prospects for wellbeing in policy, focusing on four issues in particular: reliability and validity (of data), responsibility (for action), distrust (of politicians) and distraction (from other concerns). It suggests that it is difficult to adjudicate between the various arguments as they often take very different starting points, either meta-theoretical or disciplinary. In seeking to steer a course through these arguments the chapter takes the distinction between ‘wicked’ and ‘tame’ problems as a reference point, arguing that the challenge of bringing wellbeing further into policy should be categorised as the former. The arguments are grounded in relation to empirical research on the UK, although a number of the arguments apply more generally.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.