User Generated Law
Show Less

User Generated Law

Re-Constructing Intellectual Property Law in a Knowledge Society

Edited by Thomas Riis

Engaging and innovative, User Generated Law offers a new perspective on the study of intellectual property law. Shifting research away from the study of statutory law, contributions from leading scholars explore why and how self-regulation of intellectual property rights in a knowledge society emerges and develops. Analysing examples of self-regulation in the intellectual property law based industries, this book evaluates to what extent user generated law is an accurate model for explaining and understanding this process.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 3: Collective agreements for the clearance of copyrights – the case of collective management and extended collective licences

Thomas Riis, Ole-Andreas Rognstad and Jens Schovsbo


For many years copyright exclusivity has not only protected against direct copying of works but also against public performance and secondary uses of works. As a result, the mass use of music in radio and television, the photocopying of literary works in schools, or the provision of access to website material by public libraries all require the permission of the right holders (unless permitted by a specific limitation or exception). For more than a century copyrights have been cleared through collective management organizations (CMOs) by means of collective agreements. Collective management of copyrights has proved to be mutually beneficial for copyright holders and users of copyrightable works. Mass use of copyrightable works (e.g. by a broadcaster) normally involves an extremely high number of copyrights which in practice are impossible to clear on an individual basis. Even if the broadcaster was able to identify the relevant right holders, the difficulties of contacting each right holder and negotiating an agreement would be insurmountable. Hence, a collective solution is needed. CMOs manage copyrights collectively on behalf of individual right holders. From the users’ perspective the clearance of rights becomes much easier because users only need to contact and negotiate with one or a few parties (the CMOs), and from the right holders’ perspective the CMOs facilitate the exercise of copyrights by pooling a large number of individual licences into one collective licence and then by monitoring the users of the copyrightable works and ensuring that the users comply with the licence.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.