User Generated Law
Show Less

User Generated Law

Re-Constructing Intellectual Property Law in a Knowledge Society

Edited by Thomas Riis

Engaging and innovative, User Generated Law offers a new perspective on the study of intellectual property law. Shifting research away from the study of statutory law, contributions from leading scholars explore why and how self-regulation of intellectual property rights in a knowledge society emerges and develops. Analysing examples of self-regulation in the intellectual property law based industries, this book evaluates to what extent user generated law is an accurate model for explaining and understanding this process.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 7: More competition-law-FRANDly IPR policies: a solution to SSOs’ problems of self-governance?

Olga Kokoulina and Timo Minssen


The link between innovation and economic growth has been widely acknowledged. So it comes as no surprise that the promotion of innovation has become a priority of company strategies and government policies. A major regulatory challenge in this paradigm is to craft a well-balanced design of competition law and intellectual property (IP) in a way which allows this Schumpeterian insight concerning innovation economics to be applied consistently. So far it has often been argued that equating intellectual property rights (IPRs) to conventional property rights in the course of antitrust assessment constitutes a proper approach which encourages methodological consistency. However, some examples of ongoing litigation concerned with the exercise of the FRAND_encumbered standard essential patents (SEPs) leave the impression that competition authorities might be departing from this approach and moving towards more IP-specific antitrust analysis. Furthermore, chief economists of the EU Commission and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) have recently made some proposals for possible reforms to the IPR policies of standard setting organizations (SSOs). In their article, they strongly emphasize the adverse impact of opportunistic behaviour within standardization since such behaviour can harm consumers and threaten the incentive to innovate. They also assert that SSOs have the responsibility to ensure that this risk is mitigated through an IPR policy that properly addresses this issue. This context gives rise to related claims that many existing SSO policies are not strong or clear enough to achieve this goal.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.