Cities and Partnerships for Sustainable Urban Development
Show Less

Cities and Partnerships for Sustainable Urban Development

Edited by Peter Karl Kresl

Over the past two decades, sustainability has become a principal concern for city administrators. It is a more than just environmental entailing economic, demographic, governance, social, and amenity aspects. After a short introduction to some theory, this book provides broad coverage of these aspects and their manifestations in Asia, Africa, Europe and North America. The contributors discuss, in detail, topics surrounding measurement, growth strategy, citizen participation, revitalization, and competitiveness. Though each of the cities discussed – ranging from Shanghai, to Barcelona, to Montreal – are distinct, there are similarities that connect them all. The book highlights their common elements to provide a feasible outcome for sustainable urban development.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 7: Inclusive growth and urban strategies: the case of Barcelona

Joan Trullén


Over the last three decades, most of the more advanced economies have shown a worrying increase in inequality in the distribution of income and wealth (Piketty, 2013 [2014], Chapter 1). In some of these economies, correcting this trend, associated with globalization, has become a key concern. Institutions such as the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) are proposing that governments implement inclusive growth strategies (OECD, 2014). And among these strategies are those that affect cities. The questions raised are whether inequality and economic growth are inexorably linked and, in particular, whether urban and metropolitan policies can and should play a significant role in promoting an inclusive type of economic growth which, as it increases income and wealth, can also reduce inequality. The information available about income distribution on an urban and metropolitan scale is incomplete and often does not allow comparison with state and regional territorial units. The aim is to ascertain whether cities and metropolises have higher levels of inequality in income distribution and wealth than states and regions, and how these variables evolve over time. To answer this question, consistent information is required at the different territorial levels, which in turn requires performing territorialized surveys on living conditions. Generally speaking, this information is not found in official statistics. It is also difficult to find long urban and metropolitan series that enable the evolution of these variables over time to be studied.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.