National Courts and EU Law
Show Less

National Courts and EU Law

New Issues, Theories and Methods

Edited by Bruno de Witte, Juan A. Mayoral, Urszula Jaremba, Marlene Wind and Karolina Podstawa

National Courts and EU Law examines both how and why national courts and judges are involved in the process of legal integration within the European Union. As well as reviewing conventional thinking, the book presents new legal and empirical insights into the issue of judicial behaviour in this process. The expert contributors provide a critical analysis of the key questions, examining the role of national courts in relation to the application of various EU legal instruments.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 4: Polish civil judiciary vis-à-vis the preliminary ruling procedure: in search of a mid-range theory

Urszula Jaremba


It is now widely recognized as common knowledge that many fundamental principles underpinning the EU legal system have been established through the judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union (hereinafter the Court of Justice or CJEU). Such judgments were responses to requests from national courts which decided to refer their questions concerning interpretation of EU law to the Court of Justice. This competence of national courts to send their legal inquiries to the CJEU follows from the procedure of preliminary ruling that is enshrined in Article 267 TFEU. For decades now, the preliminary ruling procedure has proven to be one of the essential, constructive mechanisms for the EU’s entire legal system. The Court of Justice held that the procedure is cardinal for the ‘preservation of the Community character of the law established by the Treaty’. Elsewhere it is asserted that the provision constitutes the most crucial procedural rule of the Treaties. The mechanism, which is of discretionary character for national lower courts5 and of obligatory character for national courts against the decisions of which there is no further judicial remedy, is based on cooperation and dialogue between national courts and the CJEU and has become the main communication channel between the supranational and national judges. The competence to refer questions to the Court of Justice is exclusively vested in national judges. Hence, the success of the mechanism relies, to a large degree, on the willingness of national courts to accept the CJEU’s authority as the highest interpreter of EU law and to cooperate accordingly.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.