National Courts and EU Law
Show Less

National Courts and EU Law

New Issues, Theories and Methods

Edited by Bruno de Witte, Juan A. Mayoral, Urszula Jaremba, Marlene Wind and Karolina Podstawa

National Courts and EU Law examines both how and why national courts and judges are involved in the process of legal integration within the European Union. As well as reviewing conventional thinking, the book presents new legal and empirical insights into the issue of judicial behaviour in this process. The expert contributors provide a critical analysis of the key questions, examining the role of national courts in relation to the application of various EU legal instruments.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 9: ‘Emulate thy neighbour?’ How dialogues between the CJEU and non-EU courts could be explained through international relations theory

Allan F. Tatham


This work aims to offer a different perspective on the perennial issue of legal transplants, cross-fertilization, borrowings and migrations which has been the comparative and EU law researchers’ delight for many years. Inside the Union, such norm transfers take place within the context of dialoguing whose main pivot is the preliminary reference procedure to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). The interaction between national courts and the CJEU in this procedure allows EU law (as interpreted by the Luxembourg court) to permeate the boundaries of domestic law. A number of studies have already examined the circumstances when national courts (fail to) refer to the CJEU or (fail to) apply CJEU interpretations in cases before them. Outside the Union, however, a different set of problems arise where no true equivalent reference procedure exists from non-EU courts. These circumstances thus call for a different perspective on the dynamics of legal interactions – based on CJEU norm interpretations – in the context of Europeanization of the non-EU judiciaries, one which can also comprehend a number of states in Europe which are parties to a variety of free trade agreements with the EU (EU-FTAs). By stepping beyond the purely legal sphere and using a constructivist approach from international relations literature (as explained below), this brief study attempts to provide an alternative explanation as to why courts outside the EU will follow or refuse to follow EU law interpretations by the CJEU.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.