From the Firm to Economic Integration
- New Thinking in Political Economy series
Chapter 16: The gap between Austrian economics and the mainstream
There is a strange problem in economics that deserves to be solved or at least to be addressed: the whole of modern economics lies on a common and single foundation, namely the subjective theory of value. However, from this same foundation, several diverging – or even opposite – theories have developed. Now, any scientific approach consists of starting from an assumption (or set of assumptions) and deducting consequences through a logical process of reasoning. If the reasoning is correct – which implies that no additional and more or less specific assumption is added surreptitiously – one might always obtain exactly the same conclusions. In physics, for instance, different theories stem from different assumptions. As an example, one may assume that the sun revolves around the earth or vice versa. But whenever an assumption has been generally adopted, the same consequences are deducted by anyone. Scientific evolution consists of drawing still unknown consequences from the initial set of assumptions or performing a scientific revolution by changing the initial assumptions.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.