Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods on Human Resource Management
Show Less

Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods on Human Resource Management

Innovative Techniques

  • Handbooks of Research Methods in Management series

Edited by Keith Townsend, Rebecca Loudoun and David Lewin

This Handbook explores the opportunities and challenges of new technologies for innovating data collection and data analysis in the context of human resource management. Written by some of the world’s leading researchers in their field, it comprehensively explores modern qualitative research methods from good project design, to innovations in data sources and data collection methods and, finally, to best-practice in data analysis.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details

Chapter 8: Doing historical research in human resource management: with some reflections on an academic career

Peter Ackers

Extract

Not many human resource management (HRM) scholars nowadays think of adopting a historical approach. Yet there are close affinities between interpretive sociology, using qualitative social science methods and the usual historical approach (see Patmore, 1998). Both share the sense that people make society and focus on what Weber termed “actors’ social meanings”. The main argument of this chapter is twofold: 1. history is worth doing and possible to do within the HRM field, and I use my own career as an illustration of this, but 2. history has a distinctive method of its own, which must be learned and respected, even if this can be combined with other social science approaches. All historians recognise that understanding and interpreting the past is a complex and uncertain process (see Carr, 1961 [2002]; Evans, 1997; Hobsbawm, 1997). Marwick (2001, pp. xiii, 33) distinguishes between The Past, as what actually happened and History, as what historians research and write about that past: “What historians do is produce knowledge about the past”. Reflection on the writing of history is termed historiography, and this is where the major methodological debates take place. In Marwick’s view, the “collective enterprise” of professional, academic history “challenges and deflates myths” about the past, many of which are misleading and dangerous. Most history is essentially qualitative, in social science terms, because its mission is to understand better how people thought and behaved in the past. This reflects the discipline’s traditional academic home in the humanities.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.