Thought, Law, Rights and Action in the Age of Environmental Crisis
Show Less

Thought, Law, Rights and Action in the Age of Environmental Crisis

Edited by Anna Grear and Evadne Grant

In the climate-pressed Anthropocene epoch, nothing could be more urgent than fresh engagements with the fractious relationships between ‘humanity’, law and the living order. This collection draws together theoretical reflections, doctrinal analyses and insights drawn from rights-based praxis to offer thoughtful – and at times provocative – engagements with the limitations of law at it faces the complexities of contemporary socio-ecological life-worlds in an age of climate crisis.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 5: Human rights and environment protection in India: the judicial journey from public interest litigation to the National Green Tribunal

Gitanjali N. Gill


The relationship between human rights and environmental protection is not linear: it has not progressed harmoniously; sometimes its nature and scope has been vigorously debated; sometimes a collision or conflict was inevitable; and at other times its implementation was – and remains – questioned. This chapter focuses on how the Indian judiciary has applied a human rights lens to analyse and address environmental protection. Two human rights, the right to a healthy environment and the right to development are examined in this context. Recognising and promoting the intertwined relationship between human rights and environmental protection is crucial. The developments presented in this chapter chart the approach adopted by the Supreme Court of India. The court has locked together constitutionally protected human rights and environmental protection through the use of Public Interest Litigation (PIL). Particular emphasis in this chapter is placed on the jurisprudence of the recently created National Green Tribunal (NGT) India, which is the new forum for environmental disputes. The recognition that human survival depends in part upon the right to a healthy environment is gaining broader acceptance at the national, regional and international levels. Globally, there is increasing constitutional recognition and enforcement by the courts of the right to a healthy environment. Additionally, the recognition by soft law instruments and treaties that are procedural, derivative or stand alone is increasingly based on an emerging understanding that environmental harm affects the right to life. In contrast, the right to development articulates the entitlement of the developing world.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.